Un professeur démocrate explique comment les 20% des contribuable américains les plus riches restaient plus prospères après avoir accompli leur devoir de contribuable sous Clinton que sous l'ère Bush:

Even the wealthiest 1% (especially the wealthiest 1%) were better off under Clinton than under Bush. Yet the media would have you believe that the Bush economy -- unlike the egalitarian Clinton economy -- is further enriching the wealthy at the expense of everyone else. And they would have you believe it because it's what they, themselves, sincerely believe to be true. As best I can determine, what they believe to be true (and what they are trying to persuade the American public is true) is actually false.